Skip to main content
Article
Religious Freedom in Faith-Based Educational Institutions in the Wake of 'Obergefell v. Hodges': Believers Beware
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
  • Charles J. Russo, University of Dayton
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Abstract

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli’s fateful words, uttered in response to a question posed by Justice Samuel Alito during oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges,2 likely sent chills up the spines of leaders in faith-based educational institutions, from pre-schools to universities. In Obergefell, a bare majority of the Supreme Court legalized same-sex unions in the United States. Verrilli’s words, combined with the outcome in Obergefell, have a potentially chilling effect on religious freedom. The decision does not only impact educational institutions—the primary focus of this article—but also a wide array of houses of worship. Other religiously affiliated institutions that may be affected include health and social services agencies, such as those working with adoptions 3 and ministering to the needy.4 These educational institutions and other agencies designed to assist the common good run the risk of being shuttered as a form of punishment, to the detriment of many, if they remain true to their faith—a decidedly un- American prospect.

Inclusive pages
263-308
Document Version
Published Version
Comments

This document is provided for download in compliance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. Permission documentation is on file.

Publisher
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Citation Information
Charles J. Russo. "Religious Freedom in Faith-Based Educational Institutions in the Wake of 'Obergefell v. Hodges': Believers Beware" Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal Vol. 2016 Iss. 2 (2016)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/charles_russo/47/