Skip to main content
Article
An assessment of equivalence between Internet and paper-based surveys: evidence from collectivistic cultures
Quality & Quantity (2012)
  • Jiaming Fang, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  • Chao Wen, Eastern Illinois University
  • Victor R. Prybutok, University of North Texas
Abstract
Little research exists that addresses the equivalence in collectivistic cultures of paper- versus Internet-based surveys. This study addressed this gap and examined the measurement equivalence of individual innovativeness scales between Internet surveys and paper-based surveys within a collectivistic culture (with China serving as our example). The study analyzed and compared survey data from both paper and web-based surveys using confirmatory factor analysis. The assessment of invariance included the levels of configural, metric, scalar, and covariance invariance. The means and variance of latent variables were also compared. The results show that measurements are invariant at the two levels (configural and metric), and the covariances between latent variables are also equivalent, but the mean and variance differences of latent variables are apparent. The results indicate that when conducting research in collectivistic cultures and collecting data from distinct survey modes, researchers should concern themselves with the potential of extreme response patterns and the inclination of social desirability responding, as well as considering the measurement invariance across survey modes.
Keywords
  • Web survey,
  • Mixed-mode survey,
  • Response biases,
  • Collectivistic cultures,
  • Measurement invariance
Disciplines
Publication Date
September, 2012
Citation Information
Jiaming Fang, Chao Wen and Victor R. Prybutok. "An assessment of equivalence between Internet and paper-based surveys: evidence from collectivistic cultures" Quality & Quantity (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/chao_wen/3/