Skip to main content
Article
What Has Eastern Europe Taught Us About the Democratisation Literature (and Vice Versa)?
European Journal of Political Research (2000)
  • Petr Kopecky, Leiden University
  • Cas Mudde, DePauw University
Abstract

The relationship between Eastern Europe and democratisation studies so far has been highly asymmetric. In contrast to the vast contribution, both in data and theory, of Eastern Europe to the democratisation literature, the latter has been of only modest use to the understanding of the democratisation processes in post communist Europe. Despite the growing number of empirically grounded assessments, most notably of degrees of democratic consolidation within East-Central Europe, there is still very little agreement on what exactly is democratic transition and consolidation or on what explains the seemingly widening gap between East-Central Europe on the one hand and the Balkans and post-Soviet republics on the other hand. We believe that at least part of the answer lies in two underdeveloped topics of the democratisation literature: state and nation-building (the ‘third’ transition) and the international dimension. Moreover, to uncover the answers democratisation studies would greatly profit from expanding its disciplinary and geographical constraints, i.e. by integrating research from, most notably, nationalism studies, international relations as well as democratisation studies of the ‘first wave’.

Keywords
  • Democratization,
  • Eastern Europe,
  • Postcommunism
Publication Date
2000
Citation Information
Petr Kopecky and Cas Mudde. "What Has Eastern Europe Taught Us About the Democratisation Literature (and Vice Versa)?" European Journal of Political Research Vol. 37 Iss. 4 (2000)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/cas_mudde/5/