Articles «Previous Next»

Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception

Carolyn McLeod, The University of Western Ontario

Abstract

This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by pharmacists who conscientiously refuse to provide it. A common view—defended by Elizabeth Fenton and Loren Lomasky, among others—is that these refusals inconvenience rather than harm women so long as the women can easily get EC somewhere else nearby. I argue from a feminist perspective that the refusals harm women even when they can easily get EC somewhere else nearby.

Suggested Citation

Carolyn McLeod. "Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception" Hypatia 25.1 (2010): 11-30.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/carolynmcleod/23