Implementing BePress' Digital Commons Institutional Repository Solution: Two Views from the Trenches
Article comments
Presentation at the 18th Conference for Law School Computing (CALI), The University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore, MD, June 19-21, 2008
Abstract
Librarians from the University of Georgia Law Library and University of Maryland Law Library discuss their experiences implementing Digital Commons' institutional repository product. Issues to be considered include:
- Creating a business plan to persuade law school administrators to establish an institutional repository -- how to justify the expenditure, distinguishing Digital Commons from SSRN, choosing Digital Commons rather than an open source solution
- Obtaining content for the repository -- promoting the repository, building buy-in from contributors, establishing content policies, determining types of materials to be included in the repository, self-archiving versus mediated archiving
- Copyright permissions -- appending supplemental language to publication agreements, SHERPA/roMEO, keeping track of copyright permissions, developing a decision flowchart for copyright permissions
- Cooperative repository applications -- liasing with other law school departments, implementing a repository in a consortium environment
Suggested Citation
Carol A. Watson, James M. Donovan, and Pamela Bluh. "Implementing BePress' Digital Commons Institutional Repository Solution: Two Views from the Trenches" Institutional Repository Supporting Materials.. Jun. 2008.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/carol_watson/15
Video of CALI Presentation