Articles «Previous Next»

Review of Samuel G. White and Elizabeth White's "McKim, Mead & White: The Masterworks" and Kristen Schaffer's "Daniel H. Burnham: Visionary Architect and Planner"

Bruno Giberti, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo

Article comments


Publisher's website: http://www.sah.org

Abstract

As any undergraduate knows, architectural history is a relentlessly visual subject. It is not impossible, but exceedingly difficult to make a convincing argument through words alone. Words must talk to pictures, in the absence of buildings, and pictures must join together to form a visual argument that is an analogue of the text. What then are we to do with the big picture books favored by publishers like Rizzoli? These serve a function and have an audience, which includes many historians, some of whom are their authors; but it is not the same function as an academic publication, which rarely graces the tops of coffee tables.

Suggested Citation

Bruno Giberti. "Review of Samuel G. White and Elizabeth White's "McKim, Mead & White: The Masterworks" and Kristen Schaffer's "Daniel H. Burnham: Visionary Architect and Planner"" Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 64.3 (2005): 381-383.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/bgiberti/3