Skip to main content
Article
Tools and Methods in Participatory Modeling: Selecting the Right Tool for the Job
Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Alexey Voinov, University of Technology Sydney
  • Karen Jenni, U.S. Geological Survey
  • Steven Gray, Michigan State University
  • Nagesh Kolagani, Indian Institute of Information Technology
  • Pierre D. Glynn, U.S. Geological Survey
  • Pierre Bommel, CIRAD
  • Christina Prell, University of Maryland at College Park
  • Moira Zellner, The University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Michael Paolisso, University of Maryland at College Park
  • Rebecca Jordan, Rutgers University - New Brunswick/Piscataway
  • Eleanor J. Sterling, American Museum of Natural History
  • Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Michigan State University
  • Philippe J. Giabbanelli, Furman University
  • Zhanli Sun, mLeibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO)
  • Christophe Le Page, CIRAD
  • Sondoss Elsawah, University of New South Wales
  • Todd K. BenDor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Klaus Hubacek, University of Maryland at College Park
  • Bethany Laursen, Michigan State University
  • Antoine J. Jetter, Portland State University
  • Laura Basco-Carrera, University of Twente
  • Alison Singer, Michigan State University
  • Laura Young, Michigan State University
  • Jessica Brunacini, Michigan State University
  • Alex Smajgl, Mekong Region Futures Institute (MERFI)
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-1-2018
Subjects
  • Qualtative analysis,
  • Mental representation,
  • Participatory modeling,
  • Water quality management -- Michigan -- Flint -- Case studies,
  • Groundwater -- Management -- India -- Case studies,
  • Floodplains -- Amazon River Valley -- Management -- Case studies
Abstract

Various tools and methods are used in participatory modelling, at different stages of the process and for different purposes. The diversity of tools and methods can create challenges for stakeholders and modelers when selecting the ones most appropriate for their projects. We offer a systematic overview, assessment, and categorization of methods to assist modelers and stakeholders with their choices and decisions. Most available literature provides little justification or information on the reasons for the use of particular methods or tools in a given study. In most of the cases, it seems that the prior experience and skills of the modelers had a dominant effect on the selection of the methods used. While we have not found any real evidence of this approach being wrong, we do think that putting more thought into the method selection process and choosing the most appropriate method for the project can produce better results. Based on expert opinion and a survey of modelers engaged in participatory processes, we offer practical guidelines to improve decisions about method selection at different stages of the participatory modeling process.

Description

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier and can be found at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028.

Originally appeared in Environmental Modelling and Software, Volume 109, November 2018, Pages 232-255.

DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028.
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/27209
Citation Information
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., ... & Sterling, E. (2018). Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job. Environmental Modelling & Software, 109, 232-255.