Architecture and copyright: a quick survey of the law
Abstract
Legal context Architecture has a special place within the law of copyright. The law does not restrict the development of architectural ideas and concepts; it does, however, prevent the copying of plans.
Key points The test is whether the plan or building was a copy of the concept or style and therefore legitimate or a copy of the author's original manifestations of that concept or style and therefore an infringement. Another interesting aspect of architectural works is that they usually take the form of a professional commission.
Practical significance The copyright owner can grant a licence either explicitly or implicitly to a third party to reproduce his work. Architects tend to be reluctant to assign their copyright,preferring to license it. If an architect is retained without a written agreement or on an agreement which does not expressly address copyright, a licence is implied. It would be difficult to give an agreement between an architect and his client commercial efficacy if the client was not entitled to use the architect's designs.
Suggested Citation
Post-print of: Adrian, A 2008, 'Architecture and copyright: a quick survey of the law', Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 524-529.
Published version available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpn114