<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Andrew J Fichter</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2011  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter</link>
<description>Recent documents in Andrew J Fichter</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:28:22 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Can Health Care Law Survive High Court Review?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/10</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:11:22 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Affordable Care Act: What Does Healthcare Reform Say About Us?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/9</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:52:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Congress Can – and Should – Mandate Health Coverage</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/8</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:37:52 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Health Care at Lake Wobegon</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:42:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>State Health Insurance Reform Efforts and ERISA</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:40:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>ERISA: The Law of Unintended Consequences</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:37:29 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>What if We Do Nothing to Reform Health Care</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:31:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Law of Doctoring: A Study of the Codification of Medical Professionalism</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:55:45 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This article argues that the concept of professionalism in health law is undergoing transformation as the applicable common law doctrines are increasingly being superseded by statutes and regulations. While legislation is perhaps the better implement when it comes to shaping the relationship among doctor, patient and society to conform to public policy, decisional law is often needed where statutes, rules and regulations inadvertently damage that relationship. Where professionalism is adversely affected by this process of codification, it is incumbent upon decisional law to call the attention of legislators and policy makers to that fact. To this end, the article first undertakes to define medical professionalism as a legal construct, and then formulates an analytic method with which to determine when professionalism is implicated and whether it is then adequately accommodated by the law. The definition of professionalism the author advances draws from concepts established in the literature of sociology, which identifies four core attributes - functional specificity, trust, disinterestedness and self-regulation. Each of these attributes is examined in turn with reference to case law selected to illustrate the nature of the value in question and the need for judicial intervention where codification has put professionalism's core values at risk.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Owning a Piece of the Doc: State Law Restraints on Lay Ownership of Healthcare Enterprises</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/2</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:32:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>State Healthcare Coverage Reform: Where is Federalism Leading Us?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/andrew_fichter/1</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:30:05 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew J. Fichter</author>


<category>Health Law</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>

