|
||||
|
Death Penalty Jurisprudence by Tallying State Legislative Enactments: Harmonizing the Eighth and Tenth AmendmentsCharles E. MacLeanIndiana Tech - Law School Akram FaizerLincoln Memorial University - Duncan School of Law February 1, 2014 Abstract: Whenever most legislatures in death penalty states have rejected a particular application of capital punishment, the Supreme Court has held that no state may retain that application, reasoning that any death penalty approach rejected by the majority of states is, perforce, unconstitutionally “cruel and unusual” under the Eighth Amendment. Although some laud these decisions, they ignore the States’ Tenth Amendment rights to govern themselves within broad constitutional parameters. Rather than defer to opinion polls or tallying state legislative enactments, the Court should engage in true constitutional analysis, forbidding cruel and unusual punishments, but simultaneously honoring states’ rights to govern themselves.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Date posted: February 18, 2014Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.172 seconds